Moby checked in with fans on his official web site journal on Wednesday (November 3), sharing his thoughts on why he thought the Democrats suffered a historic defeat at the polls the prior day. The artist blamed the economy, anonymous donors, racists and emotions. He writes:
More often than not the emotional party wins, the emotional movement gains power, and the emotional candidate wins. For example: in 2008 the Democrats were VERY emotional, and Barack Obama always seemed quite passionate about his beliefs and agenda. Let’s go back to 1980. 1980 Carter vs. Reagan. Reagan won, he was more emotional. 1984 Reagan vs. Mondale. Reagan won, he was more emotional. 1988 Bush Sr. vs. Dukakis. hard to tell, as they were both weird robots. 1992 Bush Sr. vs. Clinton. Clinton won, he was more emotional. 1996 Clinton vs. Dole. Clinton won, he was more emotional. 2000 Bush Jr vs Gore. Bush won, he was more emotional. 2004 Bush Jr vs Kerry. Bush won, he was more emotional. 2008 Obama vs. McCain. Obama won, he was more emotional (and the Republicans had trashed the country).
Generally the more emotional candidate/party/movement wins. 2010? Obama seems like a robot. Harry Reid has the emotional charisma of an old towel. And Nancy Pelosi seems like a stylish wax figure. And those are the public faces of the Democrats. The tea party and the Republicans might be ill-informed and incompetent and in the pocket of big business, but they are emotional.
Read more at Moby.com.