Christina Aguilera Buys Hats For Her ‘Stripped’ Dancers

Contributed by Nothing2Lose:

Us Weekly has in their Buzzz-o-meter about how is a fan of Isabella’s soul hats. To which she bought 12 hats for her ‘Stripped’ dancers. Each hat cost $350 and up.


Related News

10 thoughts on “Christina Aguilera Buys Hats For Her ‘Stripped’ Dancers

  1. rachel says:

    while some are busy abusing their dancers ,others are buying expensive hats for them. You go Christina!!

  2. Xtina-Dirrty says:

    Like Rachel said, some are screwing their dancers instead of treating them like a family member (like Xtina’s biggest rival) Aww… Christina’s so thoughtful and rich.

  3. hotstuff says:

    I don’t see y she even has dancers because she doesn’t dance on stage. I find more amusement out of watching a wall all day than in her performances. as a performer (dancer) for 9 years I was so insulted every time she called herself a ‘performer’ because she’s not. she hasn’t brought anything new to the table or even raised the bar or set the standard for live shows, performances, concerts etc. the way Janet, Madge and Britney have. its a pure insult.

  4. luluvon_2000 says:

    Um..in case you didn’t know, a performer can mean anything… You do NOT have to dance on stage in order to be a good performer… Believe it or not, you CAN command a stage with just your voice…A good performer can be somebody who just sings their heart out and makes you feel what they are feeling and bringing tears to your eyes…. Just because somebody dances on stage does not make them a good performer (not saying Britney isn’t a good one though) And what does being a good performer have to do with this article anyways?

  5. millagrrl says:

    Wait…you need to be a performer to buy your dancers hats???? and uhm, just a little question, you stated that you’re a dancer, hence a performer, so does that mean a person has to know how to dance to be labeled as a performer? Excuse me but I have seen many acts that doesn’t dance around on stage but can be classified as a performer, so before you pass judgment, make sure you yourself fully comprehend what it is that you are talking about. Learn the meaning of the word “performer” first before you start typing because your attempt to sound intelligence has only backfired in your face and made you sound ignorant.

  6. hotstuff says:

    yeah, singing can b part of performing but its boring. especially Xtinas way where she over harmonizes every freaking note and the Mariah style. she has no stage presence or charisma. there’s no visual element to her shows, just flailing around kinda dancing and singing. I went to her psycho blast performance because I was a former fan and it did nothing for me. for performances and live shows I need to b able to automatically click with the artist and have my senses out there. its just my personal taste. and Britney isn’t much of a singer, I prefer the title performer or entertainer because it has a bit more depth to it imo.

  7. hotstuff says:

    She has no stage presence or charisma. there’s no visual element to her shows, just flailing around kinda dancing and singing. I went to her psycho blast performance because I was a former fan and it did nothing for me. for performances and live shows I need to b able to automatically click with the artist and have my senses out there. its just my personal taste. I’ve been studying dance for almost 10 year b*tch so I know what I’m talking about. I studied it intensively and all I’m pointing out is that y bother to have dancers when you wont even b dancing with them. just because you can’t dance for nothing, don’t give me your bull

  8. musikluver says:

    You know… with all these bashers always comparing Britney with Christina.. its really got me comparing the two myself.. Britney is a far better all-around entertainer.. especially after seeing Christina’s act…. its really boring. she has no stage presence, and when watching her… its like… so what!! I end up watching the backup dancers more than her… with Britney… its all about her.. you can’t take your eyes off of her… she’s great… not the voice of Christina… but you can go to church and hear a better voice than both of them. … I want and everybody wants someone to entertain them.. and that’s what Britney does.. her voice is great for her style of music… Christina is just ear candy.. she is really so fake that it turns you off to anything else about her…. maybe she’s different when not in the public eye.. she is so needy!

    Oh.. and the hats… if she really wanted to be sweet and thoughtful,, she should have taken the time to show she really knows and appreciates them by taking the time to buy them something unique to each of their liking.. not one-stop shopping… that’s like buying a bag of candy to share with your class…. kids,,,, I had to give an example most of you can relate to… I figured candy would get your attention.. who wants to get the same gift as eleven of their friends.. I’m sure not everybody wants to wear a big $350 ghetto hat on top of their head looking like everybody else… Christina’s style is certainly not everybody elses.. really thoughtful!

  9. jimmypee says:

    she has dancers so that THEY can concentrate on dancing whilst SHE concentrates on SINGING. a very simple concept that you and you stupid cow idol haven’t got your heads around, it appears. Britney hasn’t done ANYTHING with her performances. LMAO. you guys are just classic. when oh when will you realize how lame Britney is, and how you are the only people in the world who don’t see her as an utter joke. Christina gets up on stage and wows people with her talent. Britney gets up there and makes a fool of herself, and STILL does her immature choreography (and by the way she’s a crap dancer) and lip syncs like she was doing five years ago. all her pathetic “snake” and “girl kissing” is just lame.

    you Britney fans are incredible. incredibly dumb, that is. you think “stage presence”, is LIP SYNCHING, running around a stage like a gimp, whilst 20 dancers and a bunch of pyro distracts people from how ***** Britney’s performance actually is. laughable. Christina could do that. I could do that. Stephen Hawking could do that. there is no talent involved in doing that. Christina connects to her audience with her music. and her way of using dancers so that SHE doesn’t have to constantly dance is something BRITNEY should be doing in order for her to sing live. but she doesn’t because she CAN’T sing. therefore Christina beats her in every way.

  10. amusicfanofsoul says:

    Wow since when did prancing up and down a stage like a clown have to do with the music biz? I rather hear vocal talent that no one can touch..then see prancing around that anyone can do. Britney is all around fake. literally. Christina is in the music biz…she’s a vocalist. and one thing I admire about Christina is she never always relies on her body to get her places. but we all know Britney’s body has got her places…like in Fred’s pants…not to mention Justin’s…and Collin’s…and Wade’s…omg! the list goes on. no wonder she’s the Hollywood doorknob….everyone gets a turn!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

popdirt.com