‘In The Zone’ A Flop?

Contributed anonymously:

Here are the totals for 2003 – 2004 – ‘In The Zone’ –
Chart Track:
Week 1 (11.26.03) – #1 609,364
Week 2 (12.03.03) – #3 251k
Week 3 (12.10.03) – #7 150k
Week 4 (12.17.03) – #10 158k
Week 5 (12.24.03) – #13 205k
Week 6 (12.31.03) – #10 205k


The exact Soundscan sales figues for 2003 (up to Dec. 28th) is 1,580,000 units.
Week 7 (01.07.04) – #14 72k
Week 8 (01.14.04) – #16 47k
Week 9 (01.21.04) – #11 52k
Week 10 (01.28.04) – #10 61k
Week 11 (02.04.04) – #6 63k
Week 12 (02.11.04) – #12 65k
Week 13 (02.18.04) – #21 75k
Week 14 (02.25.04) – #13 60k
Week 15 (03.03.04) – #14 53k
Week 16 (03.10.03) – #15 52k (51,750)
Week 17 (03.17.03) – #14 48k
Week 18 (03.24.03) – #16 48k
Week 19 (03.31.03) – #24 43k
Week 20 (04.07.04) – #25 41k
Week 21 (04.14.04) – #23 52k The exact SoundScan sales total at this point is 2,409,867

Total Weeks on the Market – 21
Total Weeks on the Chart – 21
Total Sales in the U.S.A.: 2,410,000
Global sales Estimate: 5,350,000 million

2,410,000+ 5,350,000= 7,760,000

nielsen.com soundscan.

So I guess that answers you hater’s questions. ‘In the Zone’ has been out for 5 months and has already sold almost 8 million copies. Compare that to Christina, it took her 2 years to sell 10 million albums and it only takes Britney 5 months to sell 8 million albums? WOW.


Related News

3 thoughts on “‘In The Zone’ A Flop?

  1. Gandhi says:

    Whatever you said still Christina won the battle because the album sales remained steady on the chart although it was outside the Top 100. Compare to In The Zone just kick out the chart in week 21st? How sad is that and by the way Stripped’ to date has sold nearly 13 M around the world

  2. BrtineyLover says:

    wrong Stripped only sold 10 mil not 13 mil and In The Zone sold more than Stripped as shown by Billboard

  3. Roger says:

    Shouldn’t Stripped be compared to OIDIA since both are sophomore albums? If there’s one thing that people will always know, here it is: Christina has the voice while Britney remains a better stage performer. Christina clearly has a very gifted voice; however, there are so many artists that can sing just as high. Britney’s voice evolved from HMBOMT to Circus, showing her growth and constant changes. I really do think that after 12 years, Britney has cemented her status as an entertainer, and it is due to the fact that she knows what she’s best at and uses it to her advantage; that is, dancing and singing catchy songs at the same time. Christina still has to find her voice. She keeps changing her genre that she loses more fans than gain some. I like both of them though.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

popdirt.com