Mariah Carey On Cover Of UK Maxim
Contributed by SJ:
Mariah Carey is on the cover of the November 2003 issue of UK’s Maxim magazine. Maxim’s official UK website says “Mariah Carey: It’s the woman with the most front in pop. Check out our unbelievable new photoshoot to see what we mean.” The magazine is on sale now.
Related News
10 thoughts on “Mariah Carey On Cover Of UK Maxim”
Leave a Reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
That is not the same shot of Christina. She is not a copycat. And stop it with this Christina antics. Christina is beautiful and so is Mariah.
Why do you people continue to put Mariah Carey in the same category as Christina and Britney. Mariah Carey is a Icon, she has the Grammys, AMA’s Award of Merit and Numerous Billboard awards. She is a multi-octave singing artist and composer. Christina and Britney are just starting out. they do not have 15 years of being successful behind them. Mariah, Whitney, Anita Baker, SADE, Madonna are icons, these new girls are trying to get to their “Status”. Mariah, had her Christina and Britney period in the 90’s where she was the biggest thing in the music business, now it’s these girls turn. Give it a break.
This cover is not the same as Christina’s. I’ve seen Christina’s (hers was hot too!) and the cover is obviously different. The only thing remotely similar could be the bathing suits maybe?? Keep going haters…maybe one day you’ll get a fact straight.’
…also the water theme, bikini, legs spread, boob shots, tan skin and so on. Both Mariah’s and Christina’s are the same.
You’re right. But if you think about it, isn’t almost EVERY Maxim shoot about legs being spread, boob shots, and tan skin?
Mariah’s Man, don’t even protect her from those idiots, Christina’s cover was darker and inside her pictures were a lot more sexual. Mariah Carey is sexy, Christina is more Out-right wit her sexuality. She can tongue kiss pink and it make the papers, she can pose nude on her cover…Mariah is more subtle, she’s older, wiser, and more laid-back,,she gives a little push-up and a little of those sexy legs….the covers and photo-shoots are 100% different.
Tig, You are so right. I like Christina a lot, but I think her cover picture was raunchier, dirtier, sweatier, if you know what I mean. Mariah is very sexy but classy and cleaner. Totally different!
100% different are you blind. They are both in water wearing bikinis with their legs spread open, they couldn’t be more alike. So Christina’s legs might be spread a little further. The styles of the shots are the same probably same photographer. He might have run out of ideas and recycled what he did with Christina for Mariah’s shoot. That would explain allot. And the word classy does not go with any of these photos.
Madonna can do a sex/lesbian book, Have erotic videos, do nude gay/lesbian videos and it’s seen as art. Janet Jackson-can do a Mariah,,hide and then show her newly developed pushed-up Tits, and showcase them in every video and get freaked in that video “Anytime Any Place”, and bed a Teenager in that video wit the soap-suds…But Mariah…removes the ball-gowns, and wears mini-skirts, and pushes her chest up and all of a sudden she’s a slut. Where are the nude videos of Mariah, the nude pics??? Where’s the lesbian book? Where is the song that diva’s usually do about masturbation? Where is her video with a woman and cross-dressers…there is none. Mariah’s pictures aren’t trashy, they were sexy. I wanted to see her body…they didn’t show enough of it…since when is a woman in a bathing suit: Slutty. I thought so. You people are back in the stone ages…..they would stone you to death if you lived in NYC.
The only thing that’s the same about the covers are they are both in water, Mariah has clothes on, she’s not showing off her ass, Now I love both Mariah and Christina, they are my two favorites ever, but I don’t see any copying in anyway. Christina’s was more out there, Mariah’s is just there, both sexy but each in different ways.