Roger Friedman of FoxNews.com reports that the appearance of Michael Jackson’s accuser before a grand jury convened by District Attorney Tom Sneddon in Santa Barbara did not go well for the prosecution. As was the case 10 years ago, Sneddon’s case against Jackson depends on the grand jury believing the veracity of a teenager. But two grand juries in 1994, you may recall, did not conclude that Jackson had molested anyone. Sources involved with this case say that the 14-year-old, who testified recently, did not make a good witness. Friedman was also told that his own lawyer cut off the questioning when he saw things were getting rough. Meanwhile, a source says the accusers mother is back in a mental hospital. Read more.
-
-
Recent Posts:
- Justin Bieber’s Alleged Paparazzi Altercation Gets Animated
- Mick Jagger Rejects Victoria Justice’s Photo Opp Request
- Jessie J Defends Tour Rider Requests
- Natalia Kills Discusses Lady Gaga, Harry Potter & More
- BC Jean Discusses Influences, ‘Talent’ & Maxim
- Florrie ‘Late’ EP Out May 31st
- Adam Lambert Thought He Wasn’t Cool Enough To Work With Pharrell
- Adam Lambert ‘Never Close Our Eyes’ Video
