Jenny McCartney of the Telegraph writes, “When Michael Jackson was taken to Santa Barbara county jail on child molestation charges last week, I felt an overwhelming sense of relief. This was not because I presume that Jackson is guilty of sexually molesting a 12-year-old boy: that is for the courts to decide. But perhaps now the authorities may take steps to limit the freakish control that Jackson exercises over the cramped lives of his own three small children, the absurdly named Prince Michael I, Paris Michael, and Prince Michael II.” Read more.
-
-
Recent Posts:
- Justin Bieber’s Alleged Paparazzi Altercation Gets Animated
- Mick Jagger Rejects Victoria Justice’s Photo Opp Request
- Jessie J Defends Tour Rider Requests
- Natalia Kills Discusses Lady Gaga, Harry Potter & More
- BC Jean Discusses Influences, ‘Talent’ & Maxim
- Florrie ‘Late’ EP Out May 31st
- Adam Lambert Thought He Wasn’t Cool Enough To Work With Pharrell
- Adam Lambert ‘Never Close Our Eyes’ Video
Jenny’s pissed because she couldn’t get a job with a reputable newspaper. I think MJ is odd, but that doesn’t justify taking his kids away. And it doesn’t matter what their names are. Lots of people in other cultures name their kids Prince and Princess. If the molestation charges are true, though, then yeah, take the kids away. If they’re not, then you can’t just take them away because you think MJ is weird.
Uh yeah you can take kids away because he’s weird, those kids are kept away from normal society, they are made to cover up with masks…they are kept away from their mother…etc etc… The best thing for his kids would be for them to be taken away and put in care with a normal family who will look after them…hopefully his kids will be grow up not too affected by their crazy “father” (where exactly does an African-American get a blonde haired, white skinned son anyway?)