Christina Aguilera Surprised By Versace Ad Look
Makeup artist Pat McGrath did up Christina Aguilera for her new campaign for designer Donatella Versace. For the singer’s pictures, she stripped her makeup and just put lotion on her face. Guido Palau kept her hair sleek. Christina was surprised by the look. She tells In Touch Weekly, “I was like, ‘You really just want straight, blown-out blond hair? That’s it?'”
Related News
13 thoughts on “Christina Aguilera Surprised By Versace Ad Look”
Leave a Reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Yes Christina! You don’t always need to wear a pound of makeup and have crazy assed hair jobs to look good. Maybe it’s time you “stripped” down your image back to basics.
I don’t wanna see Christina without makeup! That’s not a nice sight!
Those pics kinda look like the Fighter video, She doesn’t look bad without make-up, just tired.
If you wanna see Christina without her makeup go to this link: Personally I think she still looks cute, but what do I know? hereinreality.com/makeup/christuna.jpg
My god I don’t think I was ready to link at that picture.
well compared to Britney….Christina looks a whole lot better…and actually looks like a woman. the only really natural beauties of music biz are Mandy Moore and Jessica Simpson…they look the same w/out makeup kinda.
Alicia Keys is the only one who looks exactly the same without make-up and you guys are looking at the wrong pics. Go to connection.ChristinaAguilera.net/photos/versace_07.jpg
yah that’s because she knows she looks horrible without makeup on. I personally thought those pics were bad…she looked way too much like Donatella herself.
EWW!! That shoot was the *****in ugliest pictures alive! Damn, she looked so horrible. She looks horrible with makeup and without. She needs to get plastic surgery to fix up her *****ed up face. She is like a oompa lumpa, tellietubbie, talking belly, chicken drum stick leg, FAT ugly whore! Fo realz! Tuna you ugly!
^ oh and you think Evanesence would look better? she piles makeup on her fata$$ face all the time. but lets talk talent wise between the two…i don’t think I have to go on. ;)
Amy looks better and is more talented.. so yeah you don’t have to go on :)
I agree, Amy is lot more talented. She has a crystal clear, beautiful, haunting voice. She is a lot better looking too, has more style, doesn’t look like a hoochie. Seems to be more intelligent. Bring me to life is far superior than the lameness of Beautiful or fighter, more original, etc.
She just looks average without makeup, but the versace pictures which probably used a lot of bright lights, make her look more washed out than she is for the effect. Of course she was surprised, she looked dead.
Oh my, those Versace pictures. I really love them. At first I thought Christina was Audrey Hepburn and I almost mistaken her for Cindy Crawford in one of those pictures. CHRISTINA AGUILERA= HAIL THE GREEK GODDESS